Friday, May 31, 2013

Audi Service and Repair Redwood City - Audi Q7 - Bosch European Redwood City 650-368-3000




Introduction

The market for luxury SUVs is crowded, and every manufacturer is trying hard to differentiate its vehicle from the rest. In typical Audi fashion, the 2013 Q7 is notable for its engaging driving dynamics, elegantly understated interior, cutting-edge electronics and the all-weather assurance of all-wheel drive.

As was the case last year, the 2013 Audi Q7 is offered with the choice of three different engines, including a powerful and slightly more economical turbocharged diesel. This year, however, the TDI diesel receives a slight bump from 225 horsepower to 240 hp. Also new for 2013 is the Audi Connect feature, which adds Google maps and local search functions, weather updates, gas prices and mobile WiFi connectivity.

Along with the new features and praiseworthy traits that carry over, so do the Q7's less favorable characteristics. Foremost, its oversized dimensions and heavy curb weight do not equate to an abundance of interior space. While having a third row of seats is certainly a useful feature, these quarters are quite cramped and suitable for small children only. Cargo capacity is also less than you'd expect from such a large SUV.

If cargo and passenger capacity aren't the biggest selling points for you, you might do better with the smaller Audi Q5; it's more affordable, yet engaging and upscale. If space is a priority, we would also recommend taking a look at the recently updated Mercedes-Benz GL-ClassInfiniti QX56 and Land Rover LR4, all of which provide greater space for third-row passengers and cargo. Choosing the 2013 Audi Q7 will come down to whether you can give up the extra space behind the second row, since the Q7 is a world-class luxury SUV in every other way.

Body Styles, Trim Levels, and Options

The 2013 Audi Q7 is a full-size, seven-passenger luxury SUV. It is available in Premium, Premium Plus and Prestige trims, with slight differences based on whether you opt for the TDI or 3.0T engines.

The Premium comes standard with 18-inch alloy wheels, rear parking sensors, roof rails, a power liftgate (with programmable opening angle), heated mirrors, automatic wipers, dual-zone automatic climate control, eight-way power front seats with heating and four-way lumbar, leather upholstery, a tilt-and-telescoping steering wheel, a sliding/reclining 40/20/40-split second-row seat and an auto-dimming rearview mirror. Electronic features include Bluetooth phone connectivity, Audi's Multi Media Interface (MMI) and an 11-speaker sound system with console-mounted six-CD changer, in-dash single-CD player, satellite radio and an iPod interface. The TDI Premium gets 19-inch wheels and additional exterior chrome trim.

The Q7 Premium Plus gains adaptive xenon headlights, LED running lights, a panoramic sunroof, a rearview camera, front parking sensors, auto-dimming and power-folding exterior mirrors, driver memory functions, Audi Connect (enhanced Web-based navigation, information and WiFi access), a navigation system and a Bose surround-sound audio system with HD radio and DVD audio capability. The Warm Weather package adds a deep-tint panoramic sunroof, four-zone automatic climate control and manual sunshades for the rear doors and tailgate.

The TDI Prestige adds 20-inch wheels, cornering lights, keyless ignition/entry, a blind-spot warning system, power tilt-and-telescoping steering wheel, ventilated front seats and the Warm Weather package. The 3.0T S line Prestige adds those extra items, plus a more powerful supercharged V6 than the other 3.0T trims, different 20-inch wheels, headlight washers and special S line exterior trim and styling flourishes. The S line items are available on the TDI Prestige in an option package. Other options for both Prestige trims include an adaptive air suspension, 21-inch wheels, adaptive cruise control, a corner-view camera (for merging out of a blind corner), a 14-speaker Bang & Olufsen surround-sound system and an S line package that adds special interior trim.

Some features offered on upper trim levels are available on lower trims. Optional on all trims are rear side airbags, a Towing package and a Cold Weather package, which adds heated rear seats and a heated steering wheel.

Powertrains and Performance

Powering the 2013 Audi Q7 3.0T Premium and Premium Plus is a supercharged 3.0-liter V6 that produces 280 hp and 295 pound-feet of torque. The 3.0T S line version of this engine increases power output to 333 hp and 325 lb-ft of torque. An eight-speed automatic transmission and all-wheel drive are standard.

In Edmunds performance testing, a 3.0T Premium went from zero to 60 mph in 6.9 seconds -- an average time for this segment. EPA-estimated fuel economy for both versions of the 3.0T is 16 mpg city/22 mpg highway and 18 mpg combined.

The Audi Q7 TDI is powered by a 3.0-liter turbodiesel V6 that produces 240 hp and a robust 406 lb-ft of torque. Fuel economy is estimated to be 17/25/20.

Safety

Standard safety features on the 2013 Audi Q7 include antilock brakes, stability and traction control, front seat side airbags, side curtain airbags and rear parking sensors. A rearview camera is standard on Premium Plus and Prestige trims, while a blind-spot warning system is standard on the Prestige. Second-row side airbags are optional on all trims.

In Edmunds brake testing, both the Q7 3.0T and TDI came to a stop from 60 mph in 132 feet, which is long for SUVs in this class. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety gave the Q7 the highest rating of "Good" in both the frontal-offset and side crash tests.

Interior Design and Special Features

As is the case with nearly all Audis, the 2013 Audi Q7's interior receives high marks for its understated design and use of top-notch materials. The dash is clearly built around the driver, and controls are fairly easy to operate with some practice.
 
 

In terms of comfort, adult-sized passengers will be well accommodated in the first two rows. The third row, however, is suitable only for smaller children; most rivals provide quite a bit more space. Furthermore, cargo space falls short of the competition, with only 72.5 cubic feet of space with the second and third rows folded flat -- that's about the same as a Honda CR-V.

Driving Impressions

Although the 2013 Audi Q7 features full-time all-wheel drive, it is not well suited for off-road excursions. Instead, the Q7 is more at home supplying ample grip on slippery pavement or enhancing cornering prowess. The Q7's large dimensions and ponderous weight put a damper on maneuverability, particularly in tight parking spaces, but the available rearview camera eliminates much of the guesswork. Opting for the Prestige trim's air suspension broadens the Q7's appeal, as the driver can select a more luxurious or athletic setting.

The base 3.0T engine will likely suffice for a vast majority of drivers, while the more powerful S line delivers V8-like power without the fuel economy penalty. Our pick remains the TDI turbodiesel, with its prodigious torque and favorable fuel consumption.

Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Jaguar Service and Repair Redwood City - Jaguar XJ6 Model History - Bosch European Redwood City 650-368-3000




The Jaguar XJ6 was introduced in September 1968 and completely changed the Jaguar saloon car range. The car's impact is still felt by the company today. With the original Series 1 Jaguar XJ6 the Browns Lane company created a single range of cars to replace the Jaguar Mk2, S-Type, 420 and 420G. Jaguar's plan was to drop these cars within two years and focus its entire saloon car fortunes on the new car. So it had to be right.

Under the dynamic leadership of Sir William Lyons, Jaguar designed a car that reflected its heritage but moved the saloon car game on considerably. Jaguar buyers wanted space, pace and grace. They wanted class and pedigree. They chose a Jaguar because it was more youthful and stylish than a Rover. The Jaguar MK2, S-Type and 420 appealed to them and gave buyers choice, but multiple models meant costly production implications for Jaguar. By 1968 the Mk2, S-Type and 420 looked dated and archaic and were dynamically outclassed by their rivals. The S-Type and 420 also seemed to have lost the focus and all-round excellence that the Mk2 had originally delivered.

Jaguar conceived the XJ6 was a replacement for all of these cars in order to simplify its production line and focus its product offering. The XJ6 had to excel in every one of the main areas that mattered to customers - looks, comfort, space and handling. It is a reflection of the single-minded approach of Sir William Lyons that Jaguar succeeded and produced a car that, even 40 years on, is very difficult to fault in any respect. A good XJ6 is smooth, quiet, beautiful, spacious and a joy to drive.

Jaguar XJ6 Series 1
The Jaguar XJ6 was launched in 1968 with two engine sizes - 2.8 litre and 4.2 litre - which were both based on the venerable straight six XK engine used in the E Type. It wasn't a clean sheet design because under the skin Jaguar cleverly used the ultra-smooth suspension, plus the engine and drivetrain, from the 420G - components that were proven and ahead of the market.
In October 1969 Jaguar introduced Daimler variants of the XJ6 models - Daimler Sovereign, Daimler Double Six, Daimler Double Six Vanden Plas - which were essentially the same car with a Daimler grille and higher equipment levels.

In October 1972 Jaguar slotted its new 5.3 litre V12 engine into the XJ6 to create the XJ12, at the same time adding a long wheelbase version of the car with 4.2 litre (XJ6L) and 5.3 litre (XJ12L) engines. The long wheelbase added 4 inches to rear legroom and gave Jaguar a car that appealed to previous buyers of its 420G behemoth.

The appeal of the Series 1 to enthusiasts now is down to its purity of design and its relative rarity. It was also built before British Leyland began influencing Jaguar activities so product quality is considered to be better.

By the time the Series 1 was replaced by the Series 2 in September 1973. 98,527 cars had been produced.

Jaguar XJ6 Series 2
The XJ6 Series 2 was developed to meet USA Federal Safety laws concerning bumper height. Jaguar lifted the front bumper and shortened the grille to create a front end that has become synonymous with Jaguars for the last four decades. The heating and ventilation system and the interior were also improved.

In May 1975 Jaguar introduced the two-door coupe version (XJ6C and XJ12C) to broaden the range and compete with European competition from Mercedes and BMW. It was a remarkable achievement to create a beautiful and distinctive pillar less coupe from a standard saloon car. But the coupe was never particularly popular and was deleted after two years in November 1977.
In April 1975 Jaguar replaced the sluggish 2.8 litre variant with a 3.4 litre version of the XK straight six to increase power and performance.

In 1973 Jaguar standardised production around the long wheelbase version of the car and all future versions used this platform.

The Series 2 was the most prolific Jaguar XJ6 version and introduced a design style that is still current. For many an early Series 2 represents the best blend of design purity, quality and reliability. The quality of 1975-on cars reduced continuously under British Leyland control and the cars became more complex and unreliable.

The Jaguar XJ6 Series 2 was replaced in March 1979 by the Series 3. 127,078 cars were produced.

Jaguar XJ6 Series 3
For the XJ6 Series 3 Jaguar got the botox out. By 1979 the car was 11 years old and starting to show its age - several competitors had launched and replaced cars over the same period - so Jaguar turned to Pininfarina for a major face-lift. Retaining the XJ6 floor plan and basic style, the Italian styling house increased the roofline and glasshouse area, particularly for rear seat passengers, generally smoothed off the styling and integrated modern plastic bumpers. The chrome door handles were replaced with flush plastic handles and the overall effect was considered quite successful.

The model range was slimmed down to 4.2, 3.4 and 5.3 V12 variants and the car stayed in production until 1987 when it was replaced by the XJ40. 177,243 Series 3 cars were made.
The Jaguar XJ6 Series 3 is the most modern, comfortable and refined version of the car. However product quality was very patchy throughout its lifetime and good cars are now rare.


source: http://greatescapecars.blogspot.com/2008/03/jaguar-xj6-model-history.html

http://www.boscheuropean.com

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Mercedes Sprinter Service and Repair Redwood City - What type of oil should I use for my Mercedes Benz Van? - Bosch European Redwood City 650-368-3000





What type of oil should I use for my Mercedes Benz Van?

There are a few different types of oil with various ratings and numbers and letters attached to it. It may be synthetic or semi-synthetic. All this can be confusing when all you want is to put some oil in your engine.

Well I will try and explain a little bit so that you can make the right choice.

For your Mercedes Benz Vito or Sprinter you are best to use 10w-40 or 15w-40 grade oil.

All oil that you buy will have one of these types of ratings on it and what it means is this,

10w-40. The 2 numbers represents the low and high viscosity of the oil. Viscosity basically means thickness. The 10w is the viscosity at 0 degrees C and the 40 is the viscosity at 100 degrees C. The “w” next to the 10 means that it has been winter tested. There is a polymer additive combined with the oil to keep it thinner in the extreme cold and thicker in the heat which in turn will help you engine wear. So in winter you can put in 10w-40 or maybe even 5w-30 if it is really cold but in the UK 10w-40 will suffice. In the summer you could maybe think about putting 15w-40 in your engine as it generally is a thicker oil and the natural heat of the summer keeps it thinner. This is exactly why the oil is rated the way it is.

Synthetic oil has been tampered with by us humans to make an even more efficient oil for our engines, also explaining why it is more expensive. A few synthesised components used in the making of petroleum are used to help make the oil rather than manufactured solely from crude oil. Mineral oil is also an option but it is a by-product of making petroleum and was once only used as a mechanical lubricant. Now it is mass produced and being sold world wide as a motor oil. While it is OK, fully synthetic oil will help you with engine wear and you will get a more full and consistent protection from your oil. Again if you have a Mercedes Benz Vito or Sprinter then use Synthetic 10w-40 oil.

So there we go. I hope this has helped you in making your oil decision
source: http://www.sbcommercials.co.uk/news/blog/what-type-of-oil-should-i-use-for-my-mercedes-benz-van/


http://www.boscheuropean.com

Friday, May 24, 2013

Land Rover Service and Repair Redwood City - Review of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque - Bosch European Redwood City 650-368-3000

2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Pure Plus 4dr SUV


Typically, Land Rover introduces a new sport-utility vehicle to the world amid the backdrop of the Scottish Highlands or perhaps the Okavango Delta. The 2012 Range Rover Evoque, on the other hand, made its grand urban debut preening alongside Posh Spice. You see, Mrs. Beckham herself was a consultant in the creation of this new baby Range Rover. Though we're guessing her input had more to do with color combinations than transmission programming, the association alone should tell you that the new Evoque is a bit different from the Land Rover norm.

The Evoque features updated underpinnings from the Land Rover LR2, but from that rather disappointing DNA pool, spawns a substantially better vehicle. Rather than the LR2's lethargic and inefficient inline-6, the Evoque gets a turbocharged four-cylinder engine that produces class-competitive power and fuel economy. All-wheel drive is standard and comes with Land Rover's Terrain Response System. With settings for various on- and off-roading environments, this technology (lifted from the big boy Range Rover) helps the Evoque be more than just a cool car for people who wanna be like Posh Spice.

Style is another point of differentiation. The Evoque is the only model within the growing compact luxury SUV segment to offer two different body styles: a traditional four-door and a two-door known as the Coupe. Land Rover also offers contrasting roof colors, myriad interior color combinations and three "design themes" in lieu of traditional trim levels for further customization.

Overall, the 2012 Range Rover Evoque offers up a lot more character than other vehicles in its class. But much as a Mini Cooper sacrifices functionality for fashion, so, too, does the Evoque. Relative to its main competitors -- the Audi Q5, BMW X3 and Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class -- the Evoque loses out in terms of cargo space and, in the case of the Coupe, rear-seat access. The Evoque also has a higher base price than those models, though it counters that with more standard equipment. So Victoria Beckham or no, the 2012 Range Rover Evoque is a lot more than just an automotive fashion accessory. If that's all you want it for, however, we doubt it'll disappoint.

Body Styles, Trim Levels, and Options


The 2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a small luxury crossover SUV available in four-door and two-door (Coupe) body styles. Both come in a single trim level known as Pure Plus, but there are "design themes" known as Dynamic and Prestige that mostly alter the Evoque cosmetically with different materials, color choices and design flourishes.

Standard equipment on the Pure Plus includes 19-inch wheels, the Land Rover Terrain Response system, hill start assist, front and rear foglights, automatic wipers, a rearview camera, front and rear parking sensors, a power liftgate, a panoramic sunroof, keyless ignition, dual-zone automatic climate control, a tilt-and-telescoping steering wheel, power front seats (six-way driver, four-way passenger), leather upholstery, an auto-dimming rearview mirror, Bluetooth phone and audio connectivity, a touchscreen electronics interface and an 11-speaker sound system with a CD player, an auxiliary audio jack and two USB audio jacks. The Coupe can be had with a two-person rear seat as a no-cost option.

The Pure Premium package adds adaptive xenon headlamps with automatic high beams and LED accents, a blind-spot warning system, a 360-degree parking camera system, keyless ignition/entry, a navigation system (optional separately) and a 17-speaker surround-sound audio system with a 10-CD changer. If you don't need all that, the Pure Plus can be had separately with the Vision Assist package that adds the xenon headlamps as well as the blind-spot warning and camera parking systems.

The Dynamic package includes all Pure Premium equipment but features a sportier ambience with unique 19-inch wheels, different trim inside and out, a rear skid plate, different color choices and perforated leather. The Adaptive Dynamics package adds an adaptive suspension to the Dynamic package. The Dynamic is also available with a contrasting color roof.

The Prestige (four-door only) is similar in concept to the Dynamic, but features more luxurious design items. It also gets richer, more supple leather, as well as additional front seat adjustments.

Every Evoque can be equipped with optional satellite and HD radio (bundled together), 20-inch wheels and a Climate Comfort package, which consists of heating for the front seats, steering wheel, windshield washer jets and windshield. All but the base Pure Plus can be equipped with a rear-seat entertainment system.

Powertrains and Performance


Every 2012 Range Rover Evoque comes with a 2.0-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine that produces 240 horsepower and 250 pound-feet of torque. Also standard are a six-speed automatic transmission and an all-wheel-drive system with Land Rover's Terrain Response off-roading technology.

In Edmunds performance testing, an Evoque went from zero to 60 mph in 7.4 seconds -- a bit slower than average for the compact luxury SUV class. However, its EPA fuel economy estimates are better than average at 18 mpg city/28 mpg highway and 22 mpg combined.

Safety


Every 2012 Range Rover Evoque comes standard with antilock brakes, stability and traction control, trailer sway control, front side airbags and side curtain airbags. Also standard are parking sensors and a rearview camera.

In brake testing, an Evoque Pure with 20-inch wheels came to a stop from 60 mph in an impressive 118 feet.

Interior Design and Special Features


As with most British cars, the Range Rover Evoque's cabin puts a special emphasis on style. There are several multitone color combinations and trim types available within each "design theme" (Pure, Dynamic, Prestige). Materials quality is beyond reproach. The layout itself is similar to that of the Range Rover Sport, albeit with a "floating" center console and a rotary gear shifter borrowed from corporate cousin Jaguar. The large, centrally located touchscreen interface is also shared with Jaguar. It's far more user-friendly than what was fitted to prior Land Rover models, though overall operation is still a bit slow.

There's a decent amount of headroom, and the front seats are quite comfortable. The backseat is rather cramped, though the four-door model is at least a bit more accommodating and clearly the choice for families. Overall, though, the Evoque is still the least practical choice in the small luxury SUV segment. The Evoque also only has 51 cubic feet of maximum cargo space.

Driving Impressions


Despite having the most secure off-road credentials in its class, the new 2012 Land Rover Evoque is designed for a life on-road. It's impressively agile, standing toe-to-toe with other sporting compact SUVs. In true Land Rover tradition, the ride is also superb. All of this is amplified when you specify the Adaptive Dynamics package, which gets you the adjustable suspension for even better ride and handling dynamics depending on the situation or driver's whim.

Placing a four-cylinder engine in a Range Rover might seem like a recipe for epic slowness, but with 240 hp and 250 lb-ft of torque, it's actually quite a punchy engine with a pleasingly sporty rasp. It also has less mass to motivate, as the Evoque weighs a few hundred pounds less than most competitors.
source - http://www.edmunds.com/land-rover/range-rover-evoque/2012/#fullreview

http://www.boscheuropean.com

Thursday, May 23, 2013

Mercedes Service and Repair Redwood City - Mercedes SL - Class History - Bosch European Redwood City 650-368-3000

2013 Mercedes-Benz SL-Class Convertible Exterior


Automotive icons don't come more substantial than the Mercedes-Benz series of SL luxury roadsters. But the first SL wasn't a roadster and, despite that, it's still considered the greatest example of the breed. The SL story is really about the evolution of two ideas: The first produced a legendary coupe for both the street and track. The second has sired generations of elegant, capable and lavishly engineered open two-seaters.
Each generation of the SL has been exceptionally long-lived. Over more than half a century, there have only been five full-size SLs and two smaller "near" SLs (the 190SL of the late '50s and early '60s and the current SLK). That means an average SL stays in production for a full decade.

The Original 300SL Coupe (1954-1957)
Daimler-Benz recovered rapidly from the devastation of World War II and was producing Mercedes cars again by 1946 — albeit a virtually unchanged version of the 1942 model 170 sedan. Before the war, the company had considered racing (and winning) a critical part of both its engineering development and public image, and there was no reason for that to change after the war.

By the early '50s, Mercedes was ready to reenter motorsports. It looked at immediately going into Grand Prix racing, but on June 15, 1951, the Board of Management ultimately decided its initial efforts should be aimed at winning the 24 Hours of Le Mans. Less than a year later, in March 1952, the company showed the prototype for the sports car built to do that, the 300SL Coupe.

This first 300SL was built around a tubular space frame chassis and was powered by a version of the 3.0-liter, SOHC straight six that had been developed for the then-new 300S sedan, formal coupe and convertible. In the 300SL, everything was optimized for performance. The 175-horsepower high-compression engine was tilted 45 degrees toward the passenger side to lower the cowl and hood, the suspension was independent both front and rear (though the rear used rather diabolical swing axles), and the aerodynamically efficient skin was made of aluminum. However, because the space frame's design depended on interlacing small tubing running high along the car's sides for strength, conventional doors were impossible on the 300SL racecar.

Faced with that quandary, Mercedes engineers set about finding a new way for drivers to enter and exit their developing sports car. What they came up with were doors cut deep into the roof and hinged at their top, so that they swung up to open. And when open, they resembled the wings of a seagull. Naturally, the doors quickly picked up the popular nickname "gullwing" doors and soon after that, so did the car itself.

On that first racing prototype, the doors didn't extend down much beyond the side windows so getting in or out took real gymnastic ability. Plus, no one ever really explained how they'd get out of a 300SL should it wind up on its roof after a crash. But no matter, the car was a sensation. It was the first truly modern post-war sports car whose sleek lines had a negligible coefficient of drag; the suspension was advanced, and there was just 1,930 pounds spread over its 94.5-inch wheelbase and 166-inch overall length.

In May, the 300SL made its competition debut at the 1952 Mille Miglia, the epic 1,000-mile open road race that ran the length of Italy. Three 300SLs entered the race, but the winner was a Ferrari 250S. It would be one of the few times the 300SL didn't win that year. In June, 300SLs came home both first and second at Le Mans accomplishing the goal set out for the car. Then they won at the Nurburgring, and again at Mexico's Carrera Panamericana road race. The 300SL Coupe race machine was all that it was supposed to be and more. So there was nothing left for it to do, and after 1952, Mercedes abandoned sports car racing to concentrate on Grand Prix events with the astounding single-seat, eight-cylinder W196.

With its racing legend secured, the 300SL could have faded away. But Mercedes' U.S. importer, Max Hoffman, thought there would be a market in North America for a road-going version of the car. On the strength of Hoffman's passion, and his order for 1,000 300SLs, Mercedes began developing the production machine. And at the1954 New York Auto Show, the production version of the 300SL was shown for the first time.

Sharing its distinctive profile and signature door design with the racecar, it was impossible to mistake the road-going coupe for anything but a 300SL. But in fact the road car was much more civilized and, in many ways, more ambitious than the racer.

With its slab sides and austere decoration the racecar wasn't suitably ornate for a 1950s road machine — even for a Mercedes. So the body was redesigned with cooling vents, chrome trim, a bold three-pointed star in its grille, "eyebrow" protrusions over each wheel well and larger, deeper cut gullwing doors that allowed easier ingress and egress and also had small wing windows for at least some ventilation. Also instead of being built of aluminum, most of the road 300SL's body was steel with an aluminum hood, doors and trunk lid (29 all-aluminum road-going 300SLs would be built after 1956).

Carrying over more or less intact from the racecar were the tubular space frame, the independent suspension and the huge ventilated drum brakes. But while the engine was still based on the 3.0-liter, SOHC straight six from the 300S sedan (and still sat at a 45-degree angle under the hood), it now sported a groundbreaking gasoline direct injection system. The injectors were mounted in the upper part of the cylinder wall where the spark plugs would be in a standard 300 engine, and the spark plugs were in turn moved to the side of the cylinder head. Add in a high (for the time) 8.55-to-1 compression ratio and a dizzying (for the time) 6,600-rpm redline and the result was a thrilling 215 horsepower at 5,800 rpm. Keeping in mind that the same engine (with less compression, a milder cam and carburetors) was making just 115 horsepower in Mercedes' 300 sedans, and the accomplishment of the SL's engine becomes obvious.

Luxury equipment like sound-deadening leather upholstery and fitted luggage bounced the '54 300SL's weight up past 2,700 pounds and its price to a lofty $11,000 — nearly twice what GM was asking for its most expensive car that year, the $5,875 Cadillac Eldorado.

The 300SL was one of the best sports cars of its era. Stirring the all-synchromesh four-speed gearbox, Britain's Motor Sport magazine had the 300SL coupe zipping to 70 mph in just 8.5 seconds and attaining a studly 146-mph top speed. "The effect is electrifying," wrote Autocarabout the car's acceleration. Motor Trend's test had the 300SL hitting 60 mph in 8.5 seconds and the quarter-mile flashing by in 16.1 ticks of the clock. Quick though the 300SL was, it would be a mistake to call it easy or forgiving. With its swingarm rear suspension, the change in rear tire camber could be quite extreme, leading to a sudden onset of oversteer. But in the hands of an expert, that trait could be managed.

As production of the 300SL ramped up, Mercedes was able to cut the price so that in1955 it could be had for less than $7,500. But even at that "low" price, the coupe's appeal was limited by its rather tough-to-overcome tall and wide door sills, limited luggage space and notoriously toasty interior (air conditioning was not an option). If the SL were to go forward, Mercedes knew it would have to produce one tamed for the gentlemen with means who shopped Mercedes. So after building 1,400 Gullwings, Mercedes replaced the coupe with a new, more civilized open roadster for the 1958 model year (production actually began in the summer of 1957).

By the way, "SL" originally stood for "Sporty" and "Light." The original coupe will always be the sportiest SL and the last one that could accurately be described as light.
The 300SL Roadster (1958-1963)

Though destined to always be overshadowed by its charismatic Gullwing brother, the 1958300SL roadster was in many ways the first true SL as we know it today. Built atop the same basic frame, using the same basic drivetrain and having a body similar to the coupe, the roadster nonetheless projected its own aura of dignity, elegance and power.

To build the roadster, Mercedes strengthened the center tunnel portion of the chassis and the sides were revised to allow the fitment of conventional doors. The rear suspension was tamed somewhat by moving the pivot points for the swing axles lower in the chassis and by adding a supplementary spring mounted transversely above the differential and linked to the axles via vertical struts. Also improving the handling were wider front and rear tracks and wider tires.

The roadster also benefited from engine refinements, including a new camshaft and a higher (9.5 to 1) compression ratio, that bumped output to 235 horsepower. But it also weighed over 200 pounds more than the coupe, which meant performance was virtually identical.

From the outside, the most readily apparent differences between the coupe and roadster (besides the obvious decapitation) were the adoption of a wraparound-style windshield and new bezels that grouped the headlights, side marker lights and turn signals into a single, very attractive unit. Less obvious was the incorporation of a real, usable trunk. In 1961, the 300SL also got four-wheel Dunlop disc brakes for the first time.

It was a far more civilized car than the Gullwing, but sales were less than spectacular. With prices in 1958 once again hovering at nearly $11,000, that's hardly surprising.

Offered with both a soft retracting roof and a bolt-on hardtop, the 300SL set the standard by which all future SL roadsters would be judged. But even though Mercedes built more roadsters (a total of 1,858) than Gullwing coupes, they would never match the former car's iconic status.

The 190SL (1955-1963)
Except for the "SL" part of its name, some styling cues and the fact that it was a two-seat roadster, the 190SL was unrelated to the 300SL roadster. Based on the mechanical components of the prosaic 180-Series sedan, the four-cylinder-powered 190SL was always perceived as underpowered and not particularly sporty in its handling. But it was pretty.

An early prototype of the 190SL actually appeared alongside the 300SL Gullwing coupe at the 1954 New York Auto Show. With its open grille filled with a big Mercedes star and pontoon fenders featuring "eyebrows" over the wheel openings, the 1955 190SL had a family resemblance to the 300SL. But with its drooping rear and fender-capping taillights, it also looked an awful lot like a 1950 Studebaker Commander, particularly when fitted with the optional bolt-on hardtop. Since the Commander had been drawn by the famed Raymond Loewy and is generally considered a design classic, the resemblance was not necessarily a bad thing.

Under that skin (the doors, hood and deck lid of which were aluminum) lay the 180-Series suspension and structure; a simple amalgamation of stamped steel panels, double wishbones up front and the low pivot point, often ornery, swing axles in the rear. However, the 180-Series engine, a 1.8-liter L-head iron-lump four, was rated at just 52 feeble horsepower in the sedan. So instead the 190SL got a new 1.9-liter, OHC four breathing through twin Solex carburetors to make 120 horsepower when it entered production early in 1955. The engine sat upright in the nose and the only transmission was a floor-shifted four-speed manual. Eventually, the 1.9-liter engine would find its way into the sedans to produce the 190-Series and would grow in displacement to power Mercedes' mainstream midsize models through the '60s and into the '70s.
Compared to such contemporaries as the 95-horsepower Triumph TR3 or 72-horsepower MG MGA, the 190SL wasn't at all underpowered, but it was significantly heavier than those traditional sports cars. Perhaps if it hadn't shared showrooms and the spotlight with its bigger brother, it would have been considered among the best sports cars of the era. But it wasn't a Triumph or an MG, it was a Mercedes, and many sports cars shoppers dismissed it as a half-hearted car.

The 190SL stayed in production through the 1963 model year virtually unchanged and, despite critical indifference, was quite popular. The 25,881 190SLs sold probably emboldened Mercedes more than the legendary Gullwing in its decision to go forward with the SL.

The Pagoda Roof W113 SL (1963-1971)
The original 300SL established the SL name, but it was the family of SLs, starting with the 1963230SL, that made it big business for Mercedes. Effectively replacing the 190SL and 300SL, the '63 230SL was about the same length as the 190SL, but about the same width as the 300SL and, like the 300SL, powered by a fuel-injected six-cylinder engine. It was plusher than the 190SL, but less expensive than the lavishly detailed 300SL, and so civilized that it was the first SL to be offered with air conditioning and an automatic transmission.

With its square cut lines, the 230SL set the styling idiom for subsequent Mercedes products throughout the '60s. But it was the optional hardtop, which dipped at the center, that was the car's most distinctive feature. It was designed to maximize the height of the side windows to improve visibility and ease getting in and out of the car. The result was a roof that looked like a pagoda, and that became the name that stuck with the car.
Like the 190SL, the 230SL's chassis was strictly conventional (for a Mercedes). The suspension consisted of double wishbones up front and the rear still had those somewhat nasty swing arms. The body was mostly made of steel, except for the doors, hood and deck lid, which were aluminum. Mercedes also claimed that this new SL was the first sports car to feature a rigid cockpit protected by front and rear crumple zones (which the company had pioneered on its sedans). It was the first passenger car to have an alternator rather than a generator and the first sports car with an automatic transmission (conveniently overlooking that the first Corvette in 1953 was offered only with a two-speed automatic).

Power for the 230SL came from a slightly enlarged version of the 2.2-liter OHC straight six then powering the maker's mid- and full-size sedans. Displacing 2.3 liters and breathing through Bosch mechanical fuel injection, it was rated at a full 170 horsepower. The manual transmission was a conventional four-speed, but the optional automatic used a fluid coupling instead of a torque converter and functioned as a clutchless semiautomatic.

The 230SL was a sensation, attracting not just men but — thanks to the automatic transmission, elegant appearance and tasteful appointments — women. It wasn't really a sports car as much as a relentlessly practical (even the trunk was large) two-seater of grace, luxury and competence. And Mercedes didn't tamper with it much over the next eight years.

In 1967 the SL's engine grew to 2.5 liters and its name changed to 250SL. Though the larger engine didn't make any more horsepower, it did offer an additional 15 pound-feet of peak torque (a total of 174). The other big addition to the car was a set of rear disc brakes to go along with fronts. A collapsible steering wheel column was adopted this same year.

While the 250SL was an improvement over the 230SL, it was in production for less than a year before being replaced by the 280SL for 1968.

As the name indicates, the big change for the 280SL was another displacement bump for the straight six, up to 2.8 liters. The bigger engine pumped out 180 horsepower and 193 pound-feet of peak torque and was also available with an optional five-speed manual transmission. The 280SL would prove to be the most popular of the Pagoda SLs and it stayed in production through the 1971 model year. A total of 23,885 280SLs were built, compared to 19,831 230SLs and 5,196 250SLs.

Unlike the 300SL and 190SL, the Pagoda SL left production while still fully contemporary and attractive. Why replace it at all?

The V8 SL (1972-1989)
With V8 engines increasingly common aboard full-size Mercedes sedans during the late '60s, it was inevitable that a V8-powered SL would appear. But in 1972, few would have expected that the new SL (code-named "R107" inside Mercedes) would define personal luxury cars for almost two decades, and over that time, be powered by eight different engines.

The story is that while it was under development at Mercedes, the R107 was referred to as "der Panzerwagen" because it weighed more than 3,400 pounds — that's 300 or so more than the Pagoda, but still slightly short of a battle tank. Compared to the Pagoda SL, the R107's wheelbase was 2.5 inches longer, and it was about a quarter-inch wider and a quarter-inch lower. However, the styling, with horizontal headlights (paired round ones in North America, single squarish units in the rest of the world) and fluted rear taillights, made the new car appear much wider. Some criticized the car for being "Americanized." Americanized or not, it sold better than ever.

Under the more mature skin, the R107 still had a double-wishbone front suspension and a new, vastly improved trailing arm rear suspension with either the Pagoda's familiar 2.8-liter straight six or the then-new S-Class sedan's fuel-injected 3.5-liter, SOHC V8 rated at 230 horsepower. Well, at least the rest of the world had that choice. In North America, the only version available was powered by a 4.5-liter version of the same V8, also rated at 230 horsepower and paired with a three-speed automatic transmission. Yet during the 1972 model year (the R107's first over here), it would still be called the 350SL.

Introduced alongside the R107 two-seat roadster was a stretched (14-inch longer wheelbase) 350SLC fixed roof coupe. The coupe, which had seats for four, would stay in production with the SL throughout the R107's life, carrying equipment almost identical to the roadster's.

For 1973, Mercedes acknowledged the obvious and changed the names of America's R107 to 450SL and 450SLC, but carried them over otherwise virtually unchanged. However a change to SAE "net" horsepower ratings meant the 4.5-liter V8 carried a 190-horsepower rating.

Like all cars sold on the American market that year, the 1974 450SL got a set of big bumpers to meet new government regulations and an ignition interlock system that meant the car couldn't be started until the driver's seatbelt was fastened.

Emissions regulations strangled another 10 horsepower out of the 1975 450SL and the ignition interlock was gone, but otherwise the car carried over very much intact from '74. In fact the car barely changed all the way through the 1979 model year.

But 1980 brought Mercedes' new antilock braking system to the SL — the first electronic ABS offered in America. Then for 1981, the 4.5-liter engine was dropped in favor of a new all-aluminum 3.8-liter V8 rated at just 155 horsepower, and the names changed to 380SL and 380SLC. But over in Europe, a 5.0-liter, 240-horsepower version of that engine was presented in a 500SL and a few of those trickled into the United States in a developing "gray market." In 1982, a driver-side front airbag debuted, but the car would otherwise remain virtually unchanged through the1985 model year.

Mercedes finally did something about the SL's lagging performance for the 1986 model year by shoehorning in a new 5.6-liter version of the all-aluminum V8 pumping out 238 horsepower and a healthy 287 pound-feet of peak torque. Beyond that, the new power was routed through a new, silken four-speed automatic transmission, and the 560SL was quickly recognized as the fastest R107 yet. Too bad it had that ugly blister on the deck lid that contained the federally mandated third brake light. That blister would soon move to the lid's edge and shrink in size. In the early '80s, the R107 was already looking and feeling old. By the late '80s, it was absolutely archaic.

The Muscular SL (1990-2002)
By the time the R107 left production, memories of the 300SL Gullwing had grown a bit creaky and indistinct. To most of the world, a Mercedes SL had always been a brawny, luxurious two-seat roadster. Whatever sportiness it offered was incidental to the car's true mission of shuttling the rich from glamorous location to intimidating edifice and back.

The all-new R129 generation of SLs, introduced during 1989 to Europe and in early 1990 to North America, was clearly more contemporary and handsome than the outgoing car, but they were just as clearly an evolution of the species. In fact, thanks to such heavy components as a roll bar that automatically snapped up into place during an accident and a power top that used hydraulic motors to lower and raise itself with the push of just one button, the new 1990 500SL was the first SL to weigh in at more than two tons. Guess that means the "L" in SL didn't stand for "light" anymore.

Under the chiseled wedge of the R129's body was a densely packed structure with a double-wishbone front suspension and a rear end held up with a new five-link system that provided the most precise wheel location yet. Power came from either a new 24-valve, 3.0-liter, DOHC straight six in the 300SL, making 228 horsepower, or a new 32-valve, 5.0-liter, DOHC V8 making 322 horsepower. Both engines were all-aluminum, with the six lashed to either a five-speed manual or five-speed automatic transmission, and the V8 coming hooked to a four-speed automatic.

Despite their great weight, the power from the new engines meant these were among the quickest SLs since the original. But in 1992, Mercedes brought along the awesome 600SL with a massive 389-horsepower, 48-valve, DOHC V12 under its hood feeding a four-speed automatic. It was very much like having two original 300SL engines under one hood.

With Mercedes' electronic stability control, antilock brakes, "adaptive damping" shock absorbers and front airbags, the W129 SLs were among the most technologically intense road-going machines of that era. But despite this immense computerized competence, the R129 also brought back a measure of sporting vigor to the SL with Mercedes offering various "sport" packages that included items like 18-inch AMG wheels.
For the 1994 model year, the straight six was given a displacement bump to 3.2 liters. Oddly, output decreased to 217 horsepower and the 300SL became the 320SL.

Also in 1994, for no apparent reason, Mercedes renamed all of its cars by putting the letters before the numbers. So instantly the R129 variations became the SL320, SL500 and SL600. Significant changes were few however, except for the adoption of five-speed automatic transmissions by the V8- and V12-powered cars.
The Current SL (2003 - Present)
The state of the SL art now resides in what is known as "R230" inside Mercedes. Using a folding hardtop like the SLK's, the new SL is the first one since the original Gullwing not offered with a canvas roof of some sort. It's also the quickest SL ever.
With the SLK around to cover customers who might want a six-cylinder roadster, the R230 is available only with V8 or V12 engines. At the car's introduction during late 2001 (in Europe) and early 2002 badged as a 2003 model (in North America), the only version of the car available was the SL500 with 302 horsepower on tap from its 5.0-liter, 32-valve, DOHC V8. It also packed every technology Mercedes could conceive, including airbags to protect the head and thorax in side impacts, Active Body Control (ABC) to keep body roll in check around turns, Sensotronic electronic braking control and Distronic radar-controlled cruise control.

However the SL500 is hardly the ultimate R230. Within months of its introduction, Mercedes released the SL55 AMG, which put a supercharger on the SL500's motor to boost power to an astounding 493 horsepower. For the 2004 model year, Mercedes unleashed the new SL600, also generating 493 horsepower but from a twin-turbocharged 5.5-liter V12. Although the V12 offers more torque than the supercharged V8 (590 pound-feet versus 516), Mercedes claims 4.5-second 0-60 times for both cars, leading one to question why the company bothered to build them both. Mercedes insists that the visceral SL55 is aimed more at sports-car types, while the SL600, with its turbine-smooth power, is more of a grand tourer.

Nothing happened for 2005 while for 2006 Sirius Satellite Radio became a no-cost option, a tire-pressure monitor became standard and the SL600 lost its mobile phone but gained keyless starting and a heated steering wheel.

More power was the big news for 2007 as the base SL's name changed from SL500 to SL550, indicating a new, 5.5-liter V8 engine. At 382 hp, the SL550 boasted 80 ponies more than before, dropping the "entry-level" SL's 0-to-60 time to just 5.3 seconds. Other changes included the fitment of a more direct steering system, new wheels, three grille bars (versus the previous four), a deeper front airdam and a clear-lens taillight insert. The SL55 AMG and SL600 also sported more power this year as they were tweaked to put out 510 hp each. After all that, the SL remained essentially unchanged for 2008.

Although the style of this generation SL was wearing well, after six years it was time for an update, so for 2009 it received one. An aggressive new front end led the way as the circular dual headlights were replaced by more angular single piece units while a wider grille and dual hood bumps recalled the classic 300SL of the '50s. As far as hardware changes, handling prowess was increased via tweaks to the steering and Active Body Control systems. The steering adopted continuously-variable ratio technology

And the SL55 became the SL63, as the force-fed 5.4-liter V8 was replaced by a new naturally aspirated 6.2-liter unit with 518 hp. The SL63 also heralded the arrival of Mercedes' "Speedshift MCT," a new multiclutch seven-speed automatic transmission that afforded lightning-quick gear changes.


http://www.boscheuropean.com

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

BMW Service and Repair Redwood City - BMW 7 Series Review - Bosch European Redwood City 650-368-3000






Since its introduction for the 1978 model year, the BMW 7 Series luxury sedan has remained true to its original character. It's the BMW flagship, and this full-size, rear-wheel-drive sedan has always represented the pinnacle of technology and luxury accoutrements in the German automaker's lineup. As such, it's an obvious choice for wealthy car buyers seeking a spacious and elegant sedan with a high level of curbside prestige.

There's a fair amount of competition even in this elite vehicle class, but the 7 Series sedan's athletic handling dynamics have long set it apart, starting with the early 733s and carrying through to the five present-day 7 Series models. While other manufacturers have been content to build high-end sedans with soft, serene rides, BMW engineers its 7s to engage their drivers on an emotional level. There are a few recent contenders that have gone after this emotional engagement, but the BMW 7 Series remains a prime luxury sedan for people who like to drive.

Current BMW 7 Series
There are five models available. The 740i and long-wheelbase 740Li feature a twin-turbo 3.0-liter inline-6 good for 315 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque. The 750i and 750Li feature a 4.4-liter twin-turbo V8 that produces 400 hp and 450 lb-ft of torque. A six-speed automatic and rear-wheel drive are standard, and all-wheel drive (denoted with the moniker xDrive) is optional for the 750 models. The final model, the 760Li, features a 6.0-liter V12 that produces 535 hp and 550 lb-ft of torque. It is rear-drive only, and an eight-speed automatic is standard.

As BMW's flagship, the 7 Series represents the pinnacle of the company's automotive know-how. It boasts a handsome, spacious interior and superior comfort, with supple leather and rich wood accents adorning almost every surface. Highly adjustable front seats ensure comfort for virtually every body type. The 7 also showcases a wealth of high-tech luxury features such as a night-vision camera and sideview cameras. Some may still find the iDrive electronics interface system a bit complicated, but with use over time, we think the improved layout is an elegant solution to a button-heavy dashboard.

The 7 Series provides limolike interior room -- especially in Li form -- yet still remains a class benchmark for its handling prowess. The "Dynamic Driving Control" system contributes to this status, featuring four different settings that alter the driving characteristics of the car. It's complicated and we'd bet good money most folks will leave it on "Normal," but it should reward an owner who likes to customize his car to his own driving tastes.

There are many worthy choices in this illustrious car segment, but the BMW 7 Series is one of the most appealing.

Used BMW 7 Series Models
There have been five generations of the BMW 7 Series. The current 7 Series was completely redesigned for 2009. In that first year, it could only be had as the 750i and 750Li models with rear-wheel drive. Compared to the previous model, it is considered significantly more visually pleasing. The bodywork is tauter and the trunk lid has a slimmer look. The interior is also more traditional in design (the gear selector is now on the center console rather than the steering column) and the iDrive electronics interface is vastly improved versus past editions. The 760Li arrived for 2010, while the 740i debuted the following year, becoming the first six-cylinder-powered 7 Series in 20 years.

The previous-generation BMW 7 Series was produced from 2002-'08 and was by far the most radical version of the nameplate. Traditional exterior styling cues from the previous 25 years were largely abandoned in favor of a more aggressive, avant-garde design. The car was still recognizable as a BMW 7 Series, but many purists found the look abrasive. A refresh for 2006 smoothed out some of the harsher elements, but it's still a stretch to call this car beautiful, whether in standard-wheelbase 750i form or long-wheelbase 750Li and 760Li form (it was previously known as iL).

With the exception of 2002 when only a V8 was offered, the fourth-generation 7 Series lineup always included sophisticated eight- and 12-cylinder engines paired with a six-speed automatic transmission. The 745i and 745Li sold from 2002-'05 were equipped with a 325-hp 4.4-liter V8, while the 750i and 750Li that succeeded them had a 360-hp 4.8-liter V8. The 750s were slightly heavier, so performance was about the same as for the 745s.

Offered continuously from 2003, the 760Li had a 6.0-liter V12 capable of 438 hp. Unlike the V8s, which are eager to rev, the V12 delivers a massive wave of thrust as soon as you nudge the accelerator pedal. BMW offered a short-wheelbase 760i from 2004-'06.

The modernist exterior styling of this generation carried on in the cabin, where BMW's typically button-heavy control layout gave way to an all-in-one system called iDrive that governed climate, audio and navigation functions via a single console-mounted dial and a central display. Although iDrive assured the 7's place in the information age, its steep learning curve proved bewildering for many a 7 Series driver. During this 7's lifespan, iDrive was consistently upgraded, so newer 7 Series will come with the later (and less maddening) versions of this control device. Make sure to thoroughly examine iDrive before purchasing a 7 Series, or at the very least, driving it off the lot.

Even though it tended toward the esoteric, the 2002-'08 BMW 7 Series proved quite popular, largely because of its superb driving experience. Here BMW applied its arsenal of technology to great advantage, as features like self-stiffening antiroll bars, self-leveling air springs and adaptive shock absorbers worked together to keep the big sedan stable when driven hard.

The third generation, sold from 1995-2001, is generally regarded as the finest era for the 7 Series. It was a true driver's car just like today's 7, but there was less in-car technology to distract from the task at hand. And most people agree that its sleek, classically styled body was easier on the eyes.

Provided the car is in good condition, any 7 Series from this generation would make a fine purchase. Quality was generally excellent on these cars, but like most high-end German products, repair costs can be hefty as they age. The main advantage to choosing a car from later in the model cycle is added standard feature content. BMW's Dynamic Stability Control system, for example, debuted across the line for 1998.
The model lineup included the regular-wheelbase 740i sedan, which was offered every year except 1996, and the long-wheelbase 740iL and 750iL, which had an uninterrupted run. The BMW 740s were powered by a 282-hp 4.4-liter (4.0-liter in 1995) V8, while the 750iL had a 5.4-liter V12 good for 326 hp. All 7s came with a five-speed automatic transmission. Either setup provided strong acceleration, but fuel economy was poor by today's standards.

Similar in style and focus to its successor, the second-generation BMW 7 Series was on sale from 1988-'94. This was the first 7 Series to include both regular- and long-wheelbase models, the advantage to the latter being increased rear legroom. For most of the cycle, the base engine was a 208-hp 3.4-liter inline six-cylinder offered in 735i and 735iL models. A four-speed automatic transmission was standard, but a five-speed manual was offered as well. The 282-hp 4.0-liter V8 replaced the inline-6 in 1993, yielding the 740i and 740iL, both of which took a five-speed automatic only. The BMW 750iL was offered throughout the run. The first V12-equipped BMW, it had a 296-hp 5.0-liter engine and a four-speed automatic.
The first-generation BMW 7 Series enjoyed a long run from 1978-'87. It was the largest sedan the company had ever built and directly targeted the Mercedes-Benz S-Class. All 7s of this era were powered by an inline six-cylinder engine.

Friday, May 17, 2013

Jaguar Service and Repair Redwood City - The cars : Jaguar E-type development history - Bosch European Redwood City 650-368-3000




Quantum leap

 
ALTHOUGH automotive styling is subjective, the one vehicle that seems to top more opinion polls naming the most beautiful car in the world, the Jaguar E-type. Styled mainly by aerodynamicist Malcolm Sayer, with significant input by Sir William Lyons, the car caused a sensation when it was unveiled in 1961. For many, it’s also gone on to become the one car that consistently challenges the Mini as the decade’s automotive icon.

The heart of the E-type was the DOHC inline-six cylinder XK engine, originally launched in the Jaguar XK120 back in 1948. When it first appeared in 1948, the XK engine developed 160bhp, and went a long way to helping the XK120 along to become the world’s fastest series production car. It was a special engine, though – and went on to lead a very long life – a testament to its design team: Claude Bailly, William Heynes and Walter Hassan.

Its development potential soon became apparent, and with each successive new Jaguar launch, it became just that little bit more powerful: while the XK120 became the XK140 in 1954, and then the XK150 of 1957, its engine was stretched to keep each slightly heavier new variation as quick as its predecessor. In 1960, once again, the XK sports car line became a force to be reckoned with, with the arrival of the new bored-out 3.8 litre XK version, which pumped out 220bhp (SAE) and 265bhp (SAE) depending on which version you went for. It was a good starting point for the next generation of sports car – because if nothing else, the XK140 and XK150 had been criticized by owners and enthusiasts for their tendency to become fatter and heavier; thus diluting the XK line.
Jaguar E1A
The beginning of the E-type: E1A prototype being put through its paces...

So, when the XK150′s production ceased in October 1960, the world with baited breath to see what Jaguar could come up with as a replacement. After all, the C- and D-types were proving devastatingly effective on track – and what fans were expecting was something equally dominant for the road. Little did they expect…

A new sensation is conceived

The team that would create the E-type needed little encouragement. The firm’s technical director, William Heynes, had been at Browns Lane since 1935, and ended up leading the project; the body was styled by a new recruit to Jaguar, Malcolm Sayer, and here’s where the company took a real leap forward. Sayer was a modest man, though, despite his brilliant academic performance: born in Cromer, Norfolk in May 1916, he was educated in Great Yarmouth, and then in 1933 he gained a scholarship into Loughborough College, where he studied in the Automobile Department. He left Loughborough in 1938 and joined the Bristol Aeroplane Company, where he stayed for 10 years. Following a couple of years in Iraq, he returned to the UK, taking his post at Jaguar Cars in September 1950.

The greatness soon followed: the work put into the C-type paid off, as the car won the prestigious Le Mans 24 hour race in both 1951 and 1953. In 1953, William Heynes designed the one-off XKC 054/XP11 to investigate monocoque construction. For this car Malcolm Sayer designed a sleeker lower slung body which pointed the way to the E-type. However Jaguar decided an all new car was needed for competition, and created the D-type racer. Again the work paid off as Jaguar won Le Mans in 1955, 1956 and 1957, on the last two occasions, it was the privateer team, Ecurie Ecosse, that triumphed.

Under Heynes, work proper commenced on the E-type in December 1956. The first prototype was completed in May 1957, and had the official title of E-type 1 Aluminium, or E1A. The E1A was smaller than the production E-type, at 14ft 2in in length, but larger than the D-type. Its construction was largely derived from the D-type, and featured a central monocoque tub. However, where it differed from the D-type, was in its use of a new independent rear suspension system. The E1A was powered by the short-block 2.4-litre XK engine, that had been developed for the Jaguar Mk1, that had been launched in 1955.

The E1A was extensively tested by Jaguar’s team of drivers, but in May 1958, Heynes decided to lend E1A to the editor of The Motor magazine, Christopher Jennings, for an independent appraisal. Jennings was impressed by the car’s ability to cover distances rapidly, even with just 120bhp. By this time, Jaguar had built a second E-type prototype for the road, and which more closely resembled the production car. The E-type gradually evolved during 1958, a year when Jaguar also began work on the Zenith project, which became the big top of the range MkX saloon. Both cars would feature independent rear suspension designed by Bob Knight (in an amazing 27 days) as part of a bet with Jaguar boss Sir William Lyons. Knight’s suspension design would end up enduring into the 1990s…

By July 1959, Jaguar had a third E-type prototype on the road.

In 1960, the public had their first view of the style of the next Jaguar sports car when the E2A sports-racer was unveiled. E2A was not an E-type prototype as such; it was based on the D-type, but shared the future E-type’s wheelbase, and was intended to compete in the 1960 Le Mans 24 Hour, where it was entered by American Jaguar enthusiast and distributor, Briggs Cunningham. E2A retired from the event.
Jaguar E2A
E2A prototype looks more like the final production model...
Drama at Geneva
William Lyons and the E-type
William Lyons shows the E-type to the press at Geneva in 1961...
 
It was planned to unveil the E-type at the 1961 Geneva Motor Show Prior to this, Jaguar would loan the two major UK weekly motoring magazines, The Autocar and The Motor a car to test. These road tests would go on to prove pivotal in marketing the E-type, but a press embargo was in force until the actual unveiling of the new sports car. Jaguar already had one car on the company’s stand in Geneva, but it was decided that another E-type was required for Sir William Lyons to show to the media.

At around 7pm on Tuesday 14 March 1961, Jaguar’s PR department employee, Bob Berry, left Browns Lane, Coventry in a fixed head E-type, registered 9600HP. Berry drove virtually flat out through the night, arriving in Geneva, where he drove to the local Jaguar distributor for a 20-minute wash and polish, before heading to the Parc des Eaux Vives for the public unveiling by Sir William Lyons. Surrounded by up to 200 members of the press, 9600HP caused a sensation, and so did the price. At £2097 for the roadster and £2196 for the FHC, it was condemnably cheaper than similar performing cars from Ferrari, Aston Martin and Chevrolet, and was on a par with much slower cars from Porsche and AC. In fact, the E-types was initially sold at a cheaper price than the outgoing XK150.

So what was the technical specification of this sensational new Jaguar sports car? The powertrain, which was carried over from the XK150S, was a 3781 cc XK engine mated to a four-speed Moss transmission, without overdrive. Jaguar claimed the E-type engine produced 265bhp (SAE) at 5500 rpm, but this was – to say the least – an exaggeration. The cast iron cylinder block was actually manufactured by Leyland Motors in Lancashire, a task it had performed since 1948, predating its involvement in the management of Jaguar. The aluminium cylinder head came from two sources, West Yorkshire Foundries of York and William Mills of Wednesbury, Staffordshire.

The XK engine was fed by triple 2in SU HD8 SU carburetors. The body employed a central monocoque made of steel, a year before the monocoque chassis made its appearance in Formula One racing. The Bob Knight designed independent rear suspension, and the careful use of rubber, helped suppress noise and vibration. Initially, the car was available in two forms, the roadster – styled by Malcolm Sayer – and the fixed head coupe (FHC), featuring an opening rear hatchback, which also had some input from Sir William Lyons and Bob Blake. The E-type was the only Jaguar car produced during Lyons’ active involvement in the running of the company, not wholly styled by the boss himself.

So far the looks and price of the E-type had set pulses racing, but later in March 1961, came the publication of the road tests.

The Motor magazine tested 77 RW, a roadster, and the second E-type to be built by the production department. This car could reach 60mph in 7.1 seconds and attain a maximum speed of 149mph. TheMotor men assigned to the task were John Anstice Brown and Charles Bulmer, who would go on to become the magazine’s editor. An indication that perhaps the results attained by the Motor men were not typical of the standard production cars was the decision to equip the test car, 77 RW, with Dunlop R5 racing tyres. Certainly, Charles Bulmer later felt that 77 RW had a more powerful engine than standard cars.

The Autocar tested 9600HP, which was in fact the seventh E-type prototype, the second FHC, and the car Bob Berry drove to Geneva. To evaluate the car’s performance the magazine used two journalists, one with an interesting past and one with an interesting future: Maurice A Smith DFC was concurrently both editor of The Autocar and Flight. During the WW2, he had completed a tour of operations with 619 squadron, RAF Bomber Command before becoming one of Five Group’s master bombers. It was in this role that he led the first wave of bombers on the controversial Dresden raid of February 1945. His partner on the test was Peter Riviere, who later quit motoring journalism to enter the world of academia, and became a distinguished Professor of Anthropology.

The Autocar team, again using Dunlop R5 racing tyres, managed to achieve 150.4mph and a 0-60mph time of 6.9 seconds. The all-important 150mph barrier had been breached, and Jaguar Cars marketing machine exploited it.

When 9600HP was restored by its current owner, Jaguar historian Philip Porter, the engine was found to be a run in XK150S unit with a gas flowed cylinder head carefully matched to the inlet and exhaust manifolds – possibly worth an extra 20-25bhp. Maurice Smith later owned a 3.8 litre E-type roadster, and claimed he never got more than 137mph out of it. There is strong evidence that motoring journalists were provided with either carefully blueprinted or tweaked engines in order to attain headline grabbing results in order to create the myth of the 150mph Jaguar E-type.

The main criticisms of the E-type were reserved for the seating, the high oil consumption, lack of space, poor braking and the ageing Moss gearbox, which lacked synchromesh on first gear.

The E-type was launched at a time when the UK motor industry was coming out recession and bedeviled by unofficial strikes, with BMC particularly afflicted. The new Jaguar was an instant hit, and the company hoped to ramp up production to 150 per week by the Autumn of 1961. However disputes at Smiths industries and SU Carburetors, suppliers to the Coventry company, restricted production to 2160 E-types in 1961. In fact by August 1961 only 383 cars had been built.

In October 1961, Jaguar took over Guy Motors and announced the big MkX saloon, which used the same tune XK engine and transmission as the E-type. In early 1962, a series of internal industrial disputes again paralyzed production after Jaguar had won a large American order for its cars, and the disruption continued on and off for the rest of the year. Jaguar managed to ramp up production to 150 cars per week in March 1962. Despite the industrial disputes, Jaguar produced 6266 E-types in 1962. If the E-type looked futuristic, British car manufacturing industrial relations seemed positively archaic in comparison.

A sign that the E-type was not perfect was exposed by the new Ford Cortina, launched in September 1962. Unlike the Coventry car, the Cortina had synchromesh on bottom gear…

Most people tend to associate the Jaguar E-type with the so-called ‘swinging-’60s’, but the decade didn’t start swinging until 1963, when the year’s hottest new show business act, a Liverpool beat combo by the name of the Beatles, conquered Britain and swept away a whole generation of sub-Presley lookalikes and soundalikes. The Beatles’ first album, ‘Please Please Me‘ was released in March 1963, the same month that Jaguar took over Coventry-Climax, the fork lift truck manufacturer, which also happened to make racing engines as a sideline. The takeover of Coventry Climax also brought a return to the Jaguar fold of Walter Hassan, one of the XK engine’s original design team. Another major event occurred at the end of March 1963 – with the publication of the Beeching Report, which called for the closure of thousands of miles of railway branch lines.

Whatever one’s view of Dr Beeching’s report from the traffic congested viewpoint of nearly 50 years later, at the time, rail travel was seen as a relic from the Victorian era.

The public aspired towards car ownership, and as the same public were also voters, any politician who was not prepared to satisfy their aspirations risked political suicide. In Britain, a large scale motorway building program was already underway and similar programs were being undertaken across the western world. This was the brash new world of the 1960s, in which new technology would forge a bright future where the sun would always shine, and the E-type became one of the symbols of this utopia. In an era when Britain’s best selling cars, the BMC 1100 and Ford Cortina, struggled to exceed 70mph, the 150mph E-type ate up the miles on Britain’s new motorway system.

In April 1963, Autocar tested the latest revised E-type FHC, and this time reached 152.7 mph with a 0-60mph time of 7.2 seconds. After the initial rush for the car in 1961/1962, E-type production for 1963 was down to 4065.

Development of the E-type

The following February, the technical editor of Autocar magazine since 1955, Harry Mundy, joined Jaguar. Before joining the magazine, Mundy had worked for ERA, BRM and Coventry-Climax, and later designed the twin-cam engine used by the Lotus Cortina. This was also the month the Beatles conquered the USA and spearheaded the British invasion of the American music charts. When the E-type was launched, priority was given to 50 motor racing personalities, so that the car would be seen around the motor racing paddocks. Now, with the success of British pop music abroad, the Jaguar E-type was seen in the hands of the young movers and shakers of the 1960s, giving the car the all-important youthful image. George Harrison and Dave Clark were both E-type owners.

In October, Jaguar announced the new 4.2-litre XK engine for use in the MkX saloon and E-type. Built in response to the large capacity V8 engines appearing in the USA, the new 4235cc engine boosted torque from the 3.8-litre’s 260lb ft at 4000rpm to 283lb ft at 4000rpm. The quoted power output remained at 265bhp (SAE), but now at the slightly lower 5400 rpm. Along with the new engine, came a new all-synchromesh four-speed gearbox designed by William GJ Watson, although again there was still no overdrive facility for the sports car…

The E-type gained a revised electrical system and improved seating. So how did the revised car perform?

Motor magazine tested ARW 732B, a 4.2-litre FHC for its issue of 31 October 1964. It managed to attain 150mph and a 0-60 mph time of 7seconds, with more refinement, but that was not the whole story. According to David Benson, then on the staff of Motor, the testers could not get more than 148mph out of ARW 732B, so Jaguar insisted that the car was returned to them for some fettling, which duly done then provided the magic 150 figure. Autocar was not able to lay its hands on a test car until May 1965, when it tested another FHC, AWK 349B. Using Dunlop R6 racing tires, it managed 153mph and a 0-60mph time of 7.6seconds. Total Jaguar E-type production for 1964 was 3960 cars.

On New Year’s day 1965, it was announced that Jaguar were taking over the Henry Meadows diesel manufacturer whose plant was adjacent to the recently purchased Guy Motors facility. Then in February, Jaguar subsidiary Coventry Climax announced it would be pulling out of motor racing at the end of the year. This freed up its engineers to work on future road car engines for Jaguar. In March 1965 Motor Sport correspondent Denis Jenkinson took deliver of a Carmen red FHC, FPL 660C, a 4.2-litre E-type. Jenks’ job as a motor racing journalist required him to travel long distances all over Europe, often as far as Sicily, which meant he required a reliable and refined long distance car to replace his then-current mode of transport, a Porsche 356.

In 1982, he explained why he initially rejected the E-type, having borrowed a car in the south of France in 1962. He agreed the performance was phenomenal but, ‘…Compared with the Porsche I was running at the time the seats felt awful, with to little support to the back, negligible sideways support and no support at all under the knees. I could not imagine sitting in the driving seat for 12-hours on end, as I was in the habit of doing in my travels around Europe. It still had the horrid old Jaguar gearbox, which I could not stand in the XK120, with its slow change from first to second, and no synchromesh on bottom gear. There was no question of snicking into first gear quickly when you arrived at a tight hairpin in the mountains unexpectedly… I would have liked an E-type coupe, from the looks performance and all-British aspect, but I could not see it standing up to the rough usage involved in trips to Sicily, Sweden or Portugal. Firms like Porsche, Mercedes-Benz, Lancia or Ferrari gave the customer confidence; Jaguar did not.’

Having test driven the new improved 4.2-litre E-type, and been impressed by the revised car, Denis Jenkinson took the plunge and ordered one. He related: ‘As soon as I had the car I had gone over it with a set of spanners, tweaking everything up just that little bit tighter than it had been done in the factory. I talked to one of the Jaguar engineers about this and he agreed that it was no bad thing, for on the assembly line things are done to a “production tightness” which tends to be nearer to the minimum than the maximum permissible. It seemed to pay off, for in more than 200,000 miles of E-type motoring I never had anything fall off due to breaking loose.’

While all this was going on, Denis Jenkinson was acquainting himself with his new E-type. His first overseas trip was to the Pyrenees and back ‘…the long straights after Bordeaux allowed me to get into the rhythm of effortless cruising at 100mph, and I realized I was going to enjoy life living with an E-type.’

This was of course in the era before speed limits were imposed on motorists and before the 1973 oil crisis. Jenkinson continued, ‘The next trip was a bit more serious, for it was straight down to Sicily, putting in an easy 500-600 miles a day. The ride and comfort of the E-type was first class, the seats came up to all the claims made by Jaguar when they were introduced. On the Italian Autostrada a leisurely gait was 105mph… I found all day at 105mph adequate for my needs.’ One interesting point is that Jenks” cruised FPL 660C at 105mph, which was higher than the 102 mph maximum speed of his previous car, the Porsche 356. Later that year Denis Jenkinson indulged in further high speed continental motoring.

‘During this trip I had frequent occasion to use the full potential of the E-type’s 265bhp (SAE), which in reality is an honest 180bhp. I often pulled 5000rpm in top gear (about 132mph) reaching an absolute terminal of 143mph on the long Autostrada straight past Montecassino, south of Naples. Not unnaturally, one frequently became embroiled in private dices with Ferraris and other fast cars, and on one occasion I ran in company with a 250GT Ferrari at close on 120mph from Milan to Turin.’ It should be mentioned that FPL 660C had a lower compression engine in order for it to cope with the lower quality fuel on the continent.

Back in the UK the government had decided to crack down on this type of high speed motoring. On 24th November 1965, the British government imposed a 70mph speed limit, initially for four months, but now in force for over 40 years. Still this did not affect ‘Jenks’ on the continent.

‘A pretty regular trip was down the Autostrada from Milan to Modena, the home of Maserati and Ferrari among lots of other things. One of the best runs the E-type did on this stretch was 1 hour 3 minutes holding 5100 rpm in top for a long way (about 135 mph).’

The range is expanded

At the Geneva Motor show in March 1966, the delayed 2+2 E-type was announced. Right from the E-type’s earliest days, Sir William Lyons had demanded more room inside, and after a five-year gestation period, the finished article appeared. Using the internal codename of XJ8, the 2+2 was only available as a FHC and had its wheelbase lengthened by 9in to 8ft 9in. Weight was increased by 63.5kg. The 2+2 also featured a taller windscreen, longer doors and room in the back for two children. It was also available with a three speed Borg-Warner model 8 automatic transmission. The style was penned by Bob Blake. The 2+2 was the first alteration to the E-type’s form, and although stylistically it was less of a success, from a business point of view it made perfect sense. 1966 was the E-type’s best year yet, with some 6880 leaving the factory, with thenew 2+2 proving to be the most popular model.

Motor tested FVC 581D, a 2+2 FHC automatic. Top speed was 136.2mph and its 0-60mph time was 8.9seconds. Autocar, meanwhile, tested a manual version and reached a terminal velocity of 139mph and and completed the 0-60mph dash in 7.4 seconds. The E-type was getting slower…

On 11 July 1966, Jaguar and the British Motor Corporation announced they were merging to form British Motor Holdings. Effectively a takeover of Jaguar, but allowing Sir William Lyons to maintain control of his company. With two brilliant engineering teams headed by William Heynes and Sir Alec Issigonis, how could they fail?

The 2+2 E-type seemed to point the way to the future for the Jaguar sports car. Behind the scenes, Jaguar worked on its 60-degree modular V8 and V12 engines with communized parts. These were intended for a new generation of cars including the XJ21 project, which was the planned E-type replacement. Work on XJ21 commenced around October 1966, and from the off, it was planned as a purpose built 2+2. Jaguar was also looking at developing a smaller sports car using the 2.5-litre Daimler V8, a 3-litre XK engine, or the in-development 3.5-litre V8. The company was certainly ambitious, but its financial resources made such goals unobtainable. The merger with BMC put paid to plans for a smaller Jaguar sports cars with the 3-litre MGC waiting in the wings.

While this had been going on, a recession in the American car  market had forced Jaguar to go on to a four day working week from September 1966. This affected all models except the E-type and 420/Daimler Sovereign, and proved costly for the company, as it wasn’t until early March 1967 that full time working was resumed. E-type production for 1967 had been squeezed down to 4989, well down on the comparable figure for 1966. It hadn’t helped that the Labour government had imposed a credit squeeze in July 1966, that dampened home sales and caused severe problems for BMC. All these factors contributed to BMH’s £7.5m loss in the first six months to January 1967, although Jaguar would have been in profit had it remained independent. At the same time these figures were released, April 1967, Sir Donald Stokes’ Leyland Motor Corporation was reporting record sales, and was in an acquisitive mood. This convinced the government that BMH should be merged with Leyland and by late July high level meetings were already taking place.

On 5 October, 1967 Jaguar announced a revised E-type, known retrospectively as the Series 1½. This was to meet impending US emissions legislation due to come into force on 1st January 1968, and this was after it had been delayed some four months by protests from British manufacturers. Jaguar spent £250,000 to enable the E-type to meet these new regulations. The most obvious revision to the Series 1½ was the removal of the perspex headlamp covers and the moving forward of the headlamps by 2.5in. This was another bastardization of Malcolm Sayer’s design, although the Perspex covers did diffuse the headlights. According to Jaguar’s press release of the time, a total of 21 changes were made to the export cars to satisfy US regulations. In October 1967, Autocar magazine tested the latest revised E-type roadster. The car performed best with the hood up, with a top speed of 140mph. With the hood down, it could only manage 130mph. The 0-60mph time was 7.4seconds.

On 17 January 1968, it was announced that BMH and Leyland were merging to form the British Leyland Motor Corporation, and by the Autumn Sir William Lyons became deputy Chairman. But 1968 was the year when the E-type ceased to be Browns Lane’s main attraction. There was a new kid on the block, and it was unveiled on 26th September. The Jaguar XJ6 was the culmination of all Jaguar Cars technical expertise all in one car. In terms of ride, handling, stability and comfort it was in a different league to what had gone before. Not only that, but it was able to carry four people in comfort and the manual version was available with overdrive, something the E-type never had, yet was available on cheaper sports cars such as the MGB and Triumph Spitfire. The acclaim for the saloon was instantaneous and a huge waiting list soon built up and Jaguar began phasing out its older saloons to free up production capacity to produce even more. It was also reported at the time that V8 and V12 engines were in the offing.

At that year’s Earls Court motor show, the Series 2 E-type, codenamed X12, was announced. There were numerous mechanical and styling changes, but no price increase – the biggest styling change, in the 2+2 FHC, was a redesigned windscreen, eliminating the earlier ‘high hat’ look with the angle of rake increased from 46 degrees to 53.5 degrees from the vertical – a change which also improved aerodynamic efficiency. The new E-types had sturdier bumpers, which wrapped around the entire nose and tail, giving better body protection. Beneath them were new, enlarged indicators, with bigger twin stop lights at the rear. For the first time, Jaguar offered bolt-on, pressed steel wheels as alternatives to the wire-spoke type, at extra cost. The headlamps were as the Series 1½.

The front air intake had been re-shaped and enlarged, with a 68% aperture increase to give reserve capacity when air conditioning equipment was fitted. Also for the first time the E-type was offered with power-assisted rack-and-pinion steering as an optional extra. using the same system as on the new Jaguar XJ6 saloon. Air conditioning was now an option on American market cars and the car now featured a crossflow radiator with twin electric fans.

Power on the US bound cars was now down to 245bhp SAE or 171bhp (net). The new American regulations demanded a reduction in hydrocarbon emissions, and this was an area where the six-cylinder XK engine did not perform well.

So how did the Series 2 E-type perform? In November 1970, John Bolster tested a two-seat FHC forAutosport. Bolster still managed a respectable 142mph and a 0-60mph time of 7.2 seconds. Again the alterations seemed to pay off, with 9948 leaving Browns Lane in 1969, the peak year of production – and 8643 of these were exported. And this was despite a five-week strike at Leyland Vehicles in Lancashire, which supplied XK cylinder blocks which forced Jaguar to lay off workers. This was also the year Williams Heynes retired as Technical Director, to be succeeded by Walter Hassan.

In 1969, the American car magazine Road & Track carried out a survey of 100 E-type owners, and came up with mixed results. By and large, Americans owners liked the car, but the survey revealed it did have a penchant for unreliability. The main faults were inaccurate instruments, overheating, oil leaks, dodgy electrics, failing clutches, water leaks and body parts falling off. There were complaints about lack of ventilation, lack of space, poor heating and de-misting. Such comments were not lost on senior Jaguar management as it drew up the specifications of the E-type’s eventual replacement. Several UK dealers had lobbied Jaguar to raise the price of the E-type by £100 to enable more attention to be devoted to eliminating annoying faults in the car – but all to no avail.

By May 1970 it was reported that E-type production had slowed down to 250 per week. Perhaps with a huge waiting list for the more profitable XJ6 saloon led Jaguar to switch some E-type production capacity over to the newer car? Tragically in July 1970, Jaguar aerodynamicist Malcolm Sayer suffered a fatal heart attack. He was already working on the E-type’s successor which had mutated from the XJ21 into the larger XJ27/XJ-S.

In a sense the Series 2 E-type was a better car than its predecessor – American buyers, in particular, demanded more comfort and air conditioning, even at the expense of performance and looks and the sales success of 1969/70 reflected this.

Limited for the future?
Jaguar E-type Series 3
E-type Series 3 traded style for smoothness...
 
But engineering this into the ageing E-type was proving problematical as Jaguar Deputy Chairman FRW Lofty England told author Philip Porter.

‘But one of the biggest failings of the E-type was the fact that you hadn’t got enough room in the scuttle to get a decent air conditioning set up in there, which is pretty vital, and this is the reason really why we went to the XJ-S. People say “why didn’t you repeat the E-type?” “Well, there ain’t much room in the cockpit area. There isn’t much room to have a volume of air in the car, or any elbow room… People don’t realise how operating conditions have changed since 1961. Traffic is now so appalling and you spend half your time sitting in a traffic jam. If you’re sitting in traffic, you need some room to move and you need a proper, decent air conditioning system. The E-type hadn’t got it.

‘I think with motoring today, it’s just as important to have the car comfortable standing still as it is when going.’

Although it had originally planned to replace the E-type with the XJ21, finances dictated that that Jaguar examined the possibility of using a shortened XJ saloon floor pan and the forthcoming V12 engine. This made perfect sense as it enabled a degree of rationalization to take place and produce a roomier car with space for all the equipment consumers demanded. Also, Sir William Lyons wanted a more refined GT car which could retail at a higher price and generate more profit for the company. This became project XJ27 which evolved into the XJ-S. A direct E-type replacement would have to wait until the funds became available to develop one.

As related earlier, Jaguar was working on a modular 60 degree V8/V12 engine, although the V8 was to prove a blind alley. For more information on the V8/V12 saga, please look at the XJ6/12 development story. Originally the V12 was intended for the XJ saloon, but in 1968 Technical Director William Heynes pushed for the V12 engine to be used in the E-type. The shoehorning of the V12 into the E-type became project XJ25. The first prototype was completed in 1969 and extensive testing followed with 87 production cars being completed by the end of 1970.

The XJ25 was launched in March 1971 as the Series 3 Jaguar E-type and became the first car to use the new 5343cc V12 engine. The V12 was fitted with four Zenith Stromberg 175CD carburetors and was rated at 314bhp (SAE) at 5850 rpm, but by now Jaguar was admitting it was in reality 272bhp DIN. Transmission was the Jaguar four-speed manual or the optional Borg-Warner 12J three-speed automatic. At launch, Jaguar stated that the XK engined E-type would remain available in Series 3 form, but in reality only three were manufactured.

Visually the Series 3 E-type was recognizable by its enlarged air intake which was fitted with a chrome grille, similar in style to that fitted to the XJ6 saloon. Pressed steel wheels with chrome hubcaps were standard, and wire wheels were now an optional extra. The wheels were now 6in wide, an inch more than before, which resulted in the car having flared wheel arches. The Series 3 also featured a wider track, power steering as standard, and more powerful brakes. The decision was made to standardize the 8ft 9in wheelbase of the 2+2, which meant the 2-seater FHC was no longer available. So how did it perform out on the road?

At the end of 1971 Denis Jenkinson, by now running a Series 2 Roadster, spent a week test driving the new V12 E-type. ‘For all normal motoring purposes, I could not see that the V12 engine gave any particular advantage over the six-cylinder, apart from the incredible smoothness and flexibility. Obviously it had a lot more power, and it did everything the 4.2 did, at a 20mph higher speed. Where the 4.2 would cruise at 100mph with little or no throttle opening, the V12 cruised at 120mph with the foot eased right back, but at the expense of 15mpg against 21mpg. The acceleration of the 4.2 at 100 mph for instant overtaking, or getting ahead of an impending situation, was repeated by the V12 at 120mph though maximum speed was no better than the3.8-litre E-type…

When driven spiritedly, the Series 3 began to show up a lot of shortcomings, even though it had been improved with a wider track. It had lower profile tyres on wider rims, better brakes with ventilated discs, and improved dampers; but even so the new V12 engine was such a big stride forward, that the concept of the E-type could not keep pace with it – and it was all too easy to run out of roadholding, steering and braking ability if you gave the 5.3-litres their freedom.’

Motor magazine tested a Series 3 Roadster in November 1971 and achieved a maximum speed of 146mph, 3mph down on 77 RW a decade before. If nothing else, it showed how much less aerodynamic the E-type had become. What was more impressive was the 0-60mph time, now down to 6.4seconds.Autocar tested the FHC and came away with 142mph and 6.8seconds.

At £3123 for the Roadster and £3,369 for the FHC, the Series 3 was still great value for money. It was cheaper than the £3671 Porsche 911, which could only manage 125mph. If you still wanted 150mph, you could opt for the Ferrari 365GT 2+2, but it would cost £9141. By now there were even faster cars on the market, such as the Lamborghini Miura, which for £10,860 could top 170mph. The 1970s would be the decade of the supercar, and although the E-type was perhaps the progenitor of these, it was a game Jaguar could no longer afford to indulge in.

In 1971, Jaguar built 35 XK E-types and 3746 V12s, which was down on the previous few years – and was perhaps an indication that the car was losing its sales appeal.

The following year began badly for Jaguar. A two-week strike by 100 engine assemblers crippled car production. Then, in March Sir William Lyons retired, to be replaced by Lofty England. In June 1972, a ten-week strike over pay and the proposed abolition of piecework at Browns Lane brought the assembly lines to a halt. Pickets prevented the despatch of spares to dealerships. In the midst of all this, on 11th July, the Jaguar XJ12 saloon was announced – the car the V12 engine was intended for – although the strike crippled its introduction.

Nine weeks into the dispute, the now retired Sir William Lyons publicly criticised the strikers, claiming they were putting the company in jeopardy, which brought a sharp riposte from one of the strike leaders.

‘Sir William’s statement has put up the men’s backs. It seems it is always the workers who are to blame for everything. What people do not realize is that for car workers conditions at Jaguar are among the worst in the district.’

The longest strike in the history of Jaguar cars ended on 5th September after ten weeks and four days. It cost the company some £21m worth of cars and ruined the launch of the XJ12. Each of the 2000 strikers was estimated to have lost between £300 and £400 in wages. Many of the strikers complained that they rarely worked a full week as they were often sent home early due to a shortage of components from the ex-Daimler Radford factory and external suppliers.

The settlement of the dispute led to the introduction of measured day work at Browns Lane and production of the XJ12 went full steam ahead to meet demand. Denis Jenkinson borrowed an XJ12 and was able to compare it to the E-type. ‘This was in the autumn of 1972 and it proved to be a giant of a car, with road holding and handling up to using the full potential of the V12 engine. I soon realized that the E-type era was over, for on a cross country run you would have been hard pressed to keep that big saloon in sight with an E-type.’

The automatic transmission XJ12 with a maximum speed of 135.7mph was little slower than the FHC Series 3 E-type, which showed how much chassis development had progressed since 1961. In 1972 E-type production amounted to some 3705 cars, but the assembly lines had been at a standstill for around thirteen weeks during the year due to industrial disputes. Also during the year Jaguar Technical Director Walter Hassan retired to be replaced by Bob Knight.

On 6 September 1973, Geoffrey Robinson, who had been out in Italy running British Leyland’s Innocenti operation, was appointed Jaguar Managing Director working alongside Lofty England. Later in the month, a strike at power steering supplier Adwest brought the production lines to a halt, and in October the Arab-Israeli Yom Kippur war broke out. In protest at the West’s support for Israel the OPEC nations cut back oil production and raised prices with a cataclysmic effect on the world economy. In the same month, the Jaguar E-type FHC ceased production, the reason being that from 1974 all coupes sold in the USA had to be fitted with an internal roll-over bar. Jaguar then boosted roadster production.

In December, Geoffrey Robinson announced an ambitious plan to double Jaguar production by 1975. A total of 4686 E-types left Browns Lane in 1973, which to be fair was quite good and the best since 1969.

For parent company British Leyland, 1973 was a dreadful year in which it was plagued by strikes which prevented it from exploiting an expanding car market.

And so to the end…

On New Year’s Day 1974, the three day week came into force lasting until March. The Three-Day Week was one of several measures introduced in the United Kingdom by the Conservative Government 1970-1974 to conserve electricity, the production of which was severely limited due to industrial action by coal miners. The effect was that commercial users of electricity would be limited to three specified consecutive days’ consumption each week and prohibited from working longer hours on those days.

Analysing the E-type production figures, it appears during the three-day week Jaguar managed to produce around 730 cars despite the restrictions, suggesting the implications of the steep oil price rises had not hit home. Lofty England retired from Jaguar at the end of January 1974, citing friction with Lord Stokes nominee Geoffrey Robinson, who replaced him as chairman.

As for the E-type, time was running out. All cars exported to the USA from 1974 had to have ungainly rubber bumper over riders which added weight and further distorted the cars appearance. And to make matters worse there were more restrictive American safety regulations on the way for 1976. Sadly for the E-type, its boot mounted petrol tank could not meet the mandatory 30mph rearward barrier crash test due to come in force. Demand in the USA had now virtually evaporated and because Jaguar had not cut back on production, there were many unsold cars at dealerships.

 

To be fair to Jaguar, many pundits felt that the energy crisis would not affect Jaguar because of the pre-energy crisis waiting list for their cars, but quite clearly it had. Only 2759 E-types were manufactured in 1974, the last emerging in the week ending 14 September 1974. Before he retired, Lofty England took the decision to axe the car, but the E-type was ultimately doomed by American regulations, and customer expectations the car could not deliver. In 1974 the American Road & Track magazine tested a Series 3 V12 and commented: ‘What was such a magnificent engine doing in such an outdated body?’

The final E-type, registered HDU 555N was retained by Jaguar Cars, the last of 72,233 cars. As there were many unsold cars at dealers, Jaguar delayed announcing the end of E-type production until February 1975. The E-type, an icon of the Beatles era bowed out in a year when the hottest new chart act was the Wombles…

At least two Series 3 E-types were fitted with a five speed gearbox designed by Trevor Commins, working under Harry Mundy. One was fitted to Lofty England’s FHC which was written off by a Jaguar apprentice around 1975. A second gearbox was fitted in 1973 to the seventh production V12 E-type owned by Major General WM Broomhall, when his car had completed 70,000 miles.

The E-type left an enduring legacy which enabled people to forget its faults. In September 1975 the Jaguar XJ-S was launched. Criticised for its styling, initially unreliable and badly built to the point that by 1980 it faced extinction, the XJ-S suffered in comparison with its predecessor until it came good in the late 1980s. In fact the XJ-S was more aerodynamic than the Series 3, thanks to the work of Malcolm Sayer, and was designed to meet US legislation, which the E-type could no longer conform to.

The E-type had been magnificent in its 1960s heyday, but in the 1970s world of speed restrictions, motorists wanted more comfort, and sadly the E-type had to go.

Source:
 
Written by Ian Nicholls